The first live radio webcast
This is kind of interesting. (more…)
January 22nd, 2007
New link verification tool for link buyersGetting text links on authoritative sites is a very effective way of promoting your own site, and the business in turn. It can also have long-term benefits to your search engine ranking. Many online marketers pay big bucks for high quality links, on sites with high PR and/or lots of traffic. Generally the link is confirmed when the transaction takes place, but after that they are rarely checked again. This is simply because it's very hard to manage the re-validation of a large number of links, on a regular basis. So I'm very happy to make this post, as there's a new link checking tool that completely solves this problem for link buyers and exchangers. It has the following features:
This will be an invaluable tool for those who are sponsoring text links or blog posts, and need to be able to verify backlinks. If the tool alerts you to only one bad link it pays for itself!
January 21st, 2007
I had no idea where half.com got its name!This is a very interesting random post. (more…)
January 19th, 2007
Why do people try to lowball web developers?This post is the result of a private message I received recently in a webmaster's forum that I'm a member of. I guess he had seen that I have experience with Joomla, that I've created a few popular modules, so decided to see if I'd be interested in building him a customized Joomla site. Here are the details of his request:
So this is quite a large project. With a quick scan, I would estimate a minimum of 45 hours of work, as the following major time-consuming components are required:
So naturally a proper estimate will include time not only for development but also for debugging. So let's say for the sake of argument that the total project would be 50 man-hours of work. How much do you suppose this person was willing to pay? Unfortunately the global market for web developers brings down the expected rate of a good programmer. On rentacoder or elance, one can easily pick up a PHP coder's time for a measly $20/hr. That means they could get this project done for about $1000. With that in mind, I asked the buyer what their budget was. Would it be more? Less? This was their reply:
I practically choked when I read that. Two hundred and fifty dollars! That means that to this person, a developer's time is worth about $5/hour, or less valuable than someone serving hamburgers at a local burger joint. Now I admit that burger joint employees are incredibly valuable, but come on! Now that sad part is that I guarantee that some desperate young developer will accept this offer, and slave for nothing as the site owner adds "just two more things" I thought of. Then the site owner will have a fully developed site in a profitable niche, and will soon be making decent money on something that cost virtually nothing. This has to stop. I don't care where you live. I don't care if your cost-of-living is lower. Developers are intelligence workers. They not only have a skill, but they have an unteachable aptitude. This is priceless. And if they place very little value (hourly or otherwise) on that aptitude, so will others. Developers need to start properly valuing their time. I met a .Net Development Manager on a plane last year. He doesn't do web development himself, he contracts out his guys to larger companies, and manages the projects. He charges $285 USD/hour for his guys. Now I don't expect that any of us could charge that much. But we do have the right to set an acceptable rate, which won't lower the bar for the rest of the developers in the world. We are the ones that do the work. We are the ones that know how to do the work. It's a specialized work, and we need to view it as such. So set your rate. Don't accept less. And when people come to you offering $5/hour, send them to McDonald's. |